Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Woman's Advocate?

Let's take it as a given that, given two equally qualified candidates of identical ideological bent, one man and one woman, women on average will prefer the woman. (Who knows if this true ... seems like people accept it as a given these days.) I can think of a few reasons for this to be the case:
  1. Role modeling -- Nice to have someone who you can admire, whose identity you share in some way, who your daughters can aspire to be.
  2. Advocacy -- A woman is uniquely qualified to advocate for women's issues because she is a woman. She understands the unique threats and opportunities concomitant with being a woman in the world.
  3. Proof of thesis effect -- The success of the female candidate proves that all women can be successful and improves the standing of all women.
Now, to me, Sarah Palin fails pretty spectacularly on the second two counts, especially advocacy. Take sexual assault. It's an especially pressing issue in Alaska. Check it out:


Select population on the vertical axis, and the forcible rape rate on the horizontal axis. See that little dot all the way out to the right? That's Alaska. Clearly, Alaska is something of an outlier when it comes to rates of forcible rape. The next highest state is New Mexico, and Alaska is two standard deviations away. Fair to say, then, that Alaskan women are uniquely vulnerable to forcible rape. What is Sarah Palin's record on this critical issue to the women of her state?
I'm no expert on Palin's record, so she might have performed as an advocate for women in other ways. But it's shocking that she failed so badly to protect the women of Wasilla, and then the women of Alaska, from sexual predators. If women are looking for advocates in government, might be worth taking a look at Barack Obama and Joe Biden, the coauthor of the Violence Against Women Act.



No comments: